There are several opinions.
1. There is nothing wrong with selling Dias. He can be sold for 75 million at the age of 28. However, the problem is that after selling out, he failed to add a left winger.
Here is another explanation: During the summer window, Bayern searched outside for a while but failed to find a suitable left winger, so they bought the 28-year-old Dias worth 7,500. What does this mean? If Liverpool sells Dias, they will not be able to find a suitable replacement, absolutely not. Because if they can find it, Bayern will not buy Dias, so don't treat Bayern's management as a fool. As long as Bayern can find a young left winger with hot spots, they will not buy Dias. The actual situation is also the same. After the sale of Dias, there were sporadic news about the purchase of Paris Barcola from the left winger position, but the result was directly rejected, and there was no follow-up after that.
2. Dias wants to leave and pursues a high-paying contract.
This is actually not a problem for Dias, but from the club's perspective, first, does your club have the initiative? According to your statement, players can leave as they wish after signing a contract? At that time, Dias had two years left on his contract, and he would be almost 29 or 30 years old when the contract ended. To put it bluntly, would he dare to go on strike or do other outrageous things? If that's not the case, then stop being pretentious and just add liquidated damages when signing players in the future, right? Anyway, the final effect is the same, which means that players can leave as long as they plan to leave.
Furthermore, I don’t know if my memory is confused about the club’s ability to raise salary and renew the contract. Before selling Dias, and for a period of time after selling Dias, I did not see any relevant news that the club planned to raise salary and renew the contract. Is the club really willing to give Dias a salary increase and a contract extension? I still remember that when I sold Diaz, it was a very clean sale.
Finally, at the level of your club, whether you sell the item out of favor or because you think the price of 7,500 is quite good, there is only one question: have you found something that can replace it? If there is no replacement, have you discussed with the head coach whether the impact of subsequent changes to the lineup will be particularly large? However, in fact, based on the first point, if you sell the thing at that time, you will never be able to make up for it to the right person, so why bother selling it?
3. Dias has wanted to leave for a long time, even in the previous season.
Doesn't this become even more outrageous? I had the idea of leaving before, wouldn't your uniform team consider looking for a replacement? Does this mean that after at least a season, there is still no way to find a replacement?
So my idea is that your uniform team thinks from the club's perspective, either let him go and find a replacement, or else keep him. It's that simple.
Of course, there is another possibility, that is, the uniform staff communicated with the coach and expressed the intention to let him go, but there is no replacement candidate. So, can the head coach accept it?
Judging from the results, this possibility does exist and is not low.
But, but, but, how to confirm that Slott is really willing to accept the sale of Dias?
I feel that there are basically no advantages to Sloat's sale of Dias, but there are many disadvantages. What kind of situation is Dias in? His ability is at its peak, but his age and remaining contract years are very embarrassing. However, as for the head coach, according to the management themselves, the head coach is responsible for the skills and tactics on the field. So tell me, will Slott be willing to sell Diaz? I think they will definitely not be willing to sell it. What does the asset issue of your front office have to do with my head coach? Dias has been at his peak in the past two years. I will use it first, and then talk about it after using it. Having something that can be used is better than having nothing at all, isn't it? Even if there is a decline after it is used up, maybe the new contract becomes worthless, what does this have to do with my head coach? You sold Dias, and there is neither a winger who can explode, nor a replacement. So how should I deal with my lineup? Even if I, Sloat, don't like wingers and prefer to play penetration in the middle, if there is one who can be used, isn't it much better than no one using him? Of course, there is a further possibility that Slott himself feels that his tactical lineup is extremely strong, and even letting Dias go will not have any impact.
Similarly, as for the front office, your on-field lineup has flaws. What does this have to do with the assets of my club? Selling the high points is the most cost-effective and profitable way for the club.
Therefore, I think it can be seen from the incident of Dias. I really feel that Slott does not have much control over the power of discourse. Having said that, what is the conflict between the old scum and the atmosphere? In fact, it is most likely to be the competition for the power of discourse in terms of transfers. I don’t think Slott can get the power of discourse that even the old scum cannot get.
Having said that, the atmosphere follows that the head coach is only responsible for on-field affairs, and the uniform staff is responsible for off-field affairs and will not interfere with the head coach's lineup arrangement. From a theoretical level, this is true. However, in actual situations, there is no way to cut and distinguish the two. The head coach needs to consider the current lineup situation, and the uniform staff needs to think about the value-added of future assets. Sometimes the two are in opposition, and sometimes they show a unified trend. For example, let's say the head coach wants to recruit during the winter window, but then the front office buys a potential newcomer who will not be able to join the team until next season. How do you feel when you look at Slott?
Theo mọi người đội nào sẽ vô địch Champions League mùa này?
Nhiều người chê Premier League yếu ở Champions League nhưng kết quả lại khác.
Nicolò Barella của Inter Milan luôn thi đấu đầy năng lượng ở Champions League.
Real Madrid với Luka Modrić kiến tạo Champions League.
Real Madrid với Vinícius Junior rê bóng xuất sắc tại Champions League.